Microservice Tech
Shift Left Security

Security Code Review
& Secure Coding

70% of breaches exploit application vulnerabilities that could have been caught with secure coding practices and automated security testing. Integrate SAST/DAST into your CI/CD pipeline, train developers on OWASP Top 10, and prevent vulnerabilities before they reach production.

Catch Bugs Early
Automated Testing
Developer Training

Why Secure Coding Is Critical

Without secure coding standards and automated testing, you are shipping vulnerabilities directly to attackers. Shift security left by catching issues in code review, not in production.

30x
HIGHER COST

To fix a security bug in production vs during development

70%
OF BREACHES

Exploit application vulnerabilities that could have been caught with code review

90%
PREVENTABLE

Of OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with proper SAST/DAST integration

Security Testing Types

Layer multiple testing approaches for comprehensive coverage

Recommended

Static Analysis (SAST)

Analyze source code without executing it. Finds vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, hardcoded secrets

Timing:During Development
Coverage:High
False Positives:Medium-High

Pros:

  • Finds issues early
  • No running application needed
  • Fast feedback

Cons:

  • False positives
  • Misses runtime issues
  • Language-specific

Tools:

SonarQube, Semgrep, Snyk Code, Checkmarx, Fortify

Recommended

Dynamic Analysis (DAST)

Test running application like an attacker would. Finds runtime vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, authentication flaws

Timing:Staging/QA
Coverage:Medium
False Positives:Low

Pros:

  • Tests real environment
  • Language-agnostic
  • Finds runtime issues

Cons:

  • Requires running app
  • Slower
  • Misses code-level logic

Tools:

OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Acunetix, Netsparker, AppScan

Recommended

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities (CVEs). Alerts on outdated libraries with security issues

Timing:CI/CD Pipeline
Coverage:High (for dependencies)
False Positives:Low

Pros:

  • Finds supply chain risks
  • Easy to automate
  • Actionable results

Cons:

  • Only covers dependencies
  • Misses custom code
  • Upgrade fatigue

Tools:

Snyk, Dependabot, WhiteSource, OWASP Dependency-Check, Trivy

OWASP Top 10 Security Risks

Train developers to recognize and prevent these critical vulnerabilities

1

Broken Access Control

Users can access resources they shouldn't (e.g., view other users' data)

Prevention: Enforce authorization checks on every request. Default deny.

2

Cryptographic Failures

Exposing sensitive data due to weak or missing encryption

Prevention: Use TLS everywhere. Encrypt data at rest. Never roll your own crypto.

3

Injection

SQL injection, command injection, XSS—untrusted data executed as code

Prevention: Use parameterized queries. Input validation. Output encoding.

4

Insecure Design

Missing or ineffective security controls in architecture

Prevention: Threat modeling. Secure design patterns. Security requirements.

5

Security Misconfiguration

Default credentials, verbose errors, unnecessary features enabled

Prevention: Harden configurations. Disable unused features. Automated scanning.

6

Vulnerable Components

Using libraries with known vulnerabilities (outdated dependencies)

Prevention: SCA tools. Keep dependencies updated. Monitor CVE feeds.

7

Authentication Failures

Weak passwords, credential stuffing, session fixation

Prevention: MFA. Strong password policies. Rate limiting. Secure session mgmt.

8

Software & Data Integrity

Insecure CI/CD, unsigned updates, deserialization of untrusted data

Prevention: Code signing. Verify integrity. Avoid deserializing untrusted data.

9

Security Logging Failures

Insufficient logging prevents detection and incident response

Prevention: Log authentication, access control, input validation failures.

10

Server-Side Request Forgery

App fetches remote resource without validating user-supplied URL

Prevention: Whitelist allowed URLs. Network segmentation. Input validation.

Implementation Roadmap

Build a secure development lifecycle step-by-step

1

Integrate SAST in CI/CD

1-2 weeks

Automate static code analysis on every pull request

Tasks:

  • Select SAST tool: SonarQube (open-source), Semgrep, Snyk Code, Checkmarx
  • Integrate with CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins)
  • Configure to run on pull requests and block merge if critical issues found
  • Set severity thresholds: block on Critical/High, warn on Medium/Low
  • Baseline existing codebase: mark pre-existing issues as "won't fix" to avoid blocking all PRs
  • Configure IDE plugins so developers see issues locally before pushing
2

Add Dependency Scanning (SCA)

1 week

Automatically detect vulnerable dependencies

Tasks:

  • Enable Dependabot/Renovate for automated dependency updates
  • Integrate Snyk, WhiteSource, or OWASP Dependency-Check in CI/CD
  • Configure to fail builds on High/Critical CVEs in dependencies
  • Set up notifications for new vulnerabilities in Slack/email
  • Establish process for reviewing and applying security patches weekly
  • Use lock files (package-lock.json, Gemfile.lock) to ensure reproducible builds
3

Implement Security Code Reviews

2 weeks

Train team on secure coding and require security review for critical changes

Tasks:

  • Create secure coding checklist based on OWASP Top 10
  • Require security-focused review for authentication, authorization, encryption, input validation code
  • Designate security champions in each team (train 1-2 developers per team)
  • Add security questions to pull request template (e.g., "Does this handle untrusted input?")
  • Schedule monthly security code review training sessions
  • Create library of secure code examples (authentication, SQL queries, API calls)
4

Enable DAST for Staging/QA

1-2 weeks

Scan running applications for vulnerabilities before production

Tasks:

  • Select DAST tool: OWASP ZAP (open-source), Burp Suite, Acunetix
  • Configure authenticated scans (provide test credentials for full coverage)
  • Run DAST scans nightly against staging environment
  • Integrate DAST into pre-production approval gate (no deployment with Critical findings)
  • Set up alert routing: Critical findings to security team + dev team lead
  • Document remediation SLAs: Critical (24h), High (7 days), Medium (30 days)
5

Train Developers on Secure Coding

Ongoing

Establish continuous security education program

Tasks:

  • Quarterly OWASP Top 10 training (1-hour workshop per quarter)
  • Monthly secure coding tips shared in team meetings (5-10 minutes)
  • Annual hands-on security training: CTF-style challenges (DVWA, WebGoat)
  • Require new hires to complete secure coding course (SANS, Coursera, internal)
  • Share post-mortems of security incidents (sanitized) to educate team
  • Gamify: reward developers who find and fix security issues
6

Establish Security Champions Program

1-2 months

Embed security expertise in every development team

Tasks:

  • Select 1-2 security champions per team (volunteer basis)
  • Provide advanced security training (certifications: CEH, OSCP, CSSLP)
  • Champions attend monthly security guild meetings
  • Champions review high-risk code changes (authentication, crypto, access control)
  • Champions share security updates with their teams
  • Recognize champions: career growth path, conference attendance, certifications

Secure Coding Best Practices

Validate all input, sanitize all output

Why: Treat all external data as untrusted. Validate on server-side (client-side is bypassable).

Use parameterized queries (never string concat SQL)

Why: Prevents SQL injection. Use ORM frameworks or prepared statements.

Fail securely (default deny)

Why: If authorization check fails, deny access. Don't grant access on error.

Don't trust deserialized data

Why: Deserialization of untrusted data can lead to RCE. Use JSON, not pickle/serialize.

Keep dependencies updated

Why: Vulnerable libraries are low-hanging fruit for attackers. Automate updates.

Never log sensitive data (passwords, tokens, PII)

Why: Logs are often stored insecurely and accessible to many people.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

SAST finds 1000 issues, team ignores all of them

Solution: Start with Critical/High only. Fix blocking issues first. Gradually reduce threshold. Don't boil the ocean.

Security testing only in production

Solution: Shift left: run SAST on every PR, DAST in staging. Find issues before production.

Developers don't understand security findings

Solution: Provide context: why it matters, how to exploit, how to fix. Link to examples.

Security team as bottleneck for all reviews

Solution: Train security champions. Empower developers to self-review. Security team focuses on high-risk changes.

Treating security tools as "set and forget"

Solution: Tune rules based on your codebase. Review false positives. Update tool configurations quarterly.

Measure Your Secure Coding Success

Track these metrics to ensure your program is effective

<5/year
Security Issues in Production
Catch issues before they ship
<24 hrs
Time to Fix Critical Issues
Fast remediation of vulnerabilities
100%
Developer Training Coverage
All developers trained on OWASP Top 10